Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00749-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,620,565, entitled “Customer-Based Product Design Module” and U.S. Patent No. 7,222,078, entitled “Methods and Systems for Gathering Information from Units of a Commodity Across a Network.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: William E. Davis III, The Davis Firm, Longview; Michael A. Goldfarb, Christopher M. Huck and Kit W. Roth, Kelley, Goldfarb, Gill, Huck & Roth, Seattle
Lodsys Group LLC v. Burberry Limited, Dover Saddlery Inc., Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Godiva Chocolatier Inc. and Hanna Andersson LLC
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00749-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,620,565, entitled “Customer-Based Product Design Module” and U.S. Patent No. 7,222,078, entitled “Methods and Systems for Gathering Information from Units of a Commodity Across a Network.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: William E. Davis III, The Davis Firm, Longview; Michael A. Goldfarb, Christopher M. Huck and Kit W. Roth, Kelley, Goldfarb, Gill, Huck & Roth, Seattle
Qexez LLC v. Keynote Systems Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00751-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,596,373, entitled “Method and System For Quality of Service (QOS) Monitoring For Wireless Devices.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
Qexez LLC v. RADCOM Equipment Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00752
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,596,373, entitled “Method and System For Quality of Service (QOS) Monitoring For Wireless Devices.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Huawei Device USA Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00753
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Craig L. Uhrich, Oakley, Kan.
Qexez LLC v. Tektronix Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00754
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,596,373, entitled “Method and System For Quality of Service (QOS) Monitoring For Wireless Devices.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Sony-Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00756
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Craig L. Uhrich, Oakley, Kan.
NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Coolpad Technologies Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00757
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Craig L. Uhrich, Oakley, Kan.
MacroSolve Inc. v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00915-LED
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816, entitled “System and Method for Data Management.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Matthew J. Antonelli, Zachariah S. Harrington, Larry D. Thompson Jr. and Califf T. Cooper, Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson, Houston
MacroSolve Inc. v. Sears Holdings Management Corp., Sears Holdings Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corp. and Kmart Holding Corp.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00916-LED
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816, entitled “System and Method for Data Management.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Matthew J. Antonelli, Zachariah S. Harrington, Larry D. Thompson Jr. and Califf T. Cooper, Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson, Houston
MacroSolve Inc. v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00917-LED
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816, entitled “System and Method for Data Management.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Matthew J. Antonelli, Zachariah S. Harrington, Larry D. Thompson Jr. and Califf T. Cooper, Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson, Houston
Swipe Innovations LLC v. NCR Corp.
Civil Action No: 9:12-cv-00205-RC
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,351,296, entitled “Financial Transmission System.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Larry D. Thompson Jr., Matthew J. Antonelli and Zachariah S. Harrington, Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson, Houston; Stafford Davis, The Stafford Davis Firm, Tyler
Comments