Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00617-RAS
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. v. Citigroup Inc. and Citibank National Association
Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00618
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00619-RC-ALM
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. v. Target Corporation
Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00620
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank N.A.
Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00621-RAS
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00622-RC-ALM
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Maxim Integrated Products Inc. v. Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Advisors LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network LLC
Civil Action No: 4:12-cv-00623-RAS
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,940,510 and U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880, both entitled “Transfer of Valuable Information Between a Secure Module and Another Module;” U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013, entitled “Method, Apparatus, System, and Firmware for Secure Transactions;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,237,095, entitled “Apparatus for Transfer of Secure Information Between a Data Carrying Module and an Electronic Device.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Matthew. D. Powers and Steven S. Cherensky, Tensegrity Law Group, Redwood Shores, Calif.; James C. Otteson, Philip W. Marsh and Michael D.K. Nguyen, Agility IP Law, Menlo Park, Calif.; Michael North, North Weber & Baugh, Palo Alto, Calif., of counsel
Comments