Quxuz LLC v. Wix.com Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00595-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,353,199, entitled “Method of Moderating External Access to an Electronic Document Authoring Development and Distribution System.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
Quxuz LLC v. IconoSites and Nicholas Friend
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00596-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,353,199, entitled “Method of Moderating External Access to an Electronic Document Authoring Development and Distribution System.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
Quxuz LLC v. Yola Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00597-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,353,199, entitled “Method of Moderating External Access to an Electronic Document Authoring Development and Distribution System.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
Quxuz LLC v. WebStarts LLC
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00598-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,353,199, entitled “Method of Moderating External Access to an Electronic Document Authoring Development and Distribution System.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
Telecommunications Research Laboratories f/k/a Alberta Telecommunications Research Centre d/b/a TR Labs and TR Technologies Inc. v. Earthlink Inc., Zayo Group LLC, Charter Communications Inc. and Masergy Communications Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00599-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S Patent No. 6,914,880, entitled “Protection of routers in a telecommunications network;” U.S. Patent No. 6,421,349, entitled “Distributed preconfiguration of spare capacity in closed paths for network restoration;” U.S. Patent No. 7,260,059, entitled “Evolution of a telecommunications network from ring to mesh structure;” U.S. Patent No. 6,404,734, entitled “Scalable network restoration device;” U.S. Patent No. 4,956,835, entitled “Method and apparatus for self-restoring and self-provisioning communication networks;” U.S. Patent No. 5,850,505, entitled “Method for preconfiguring a network to withstand anticipated failures;” U.S. Patent No. 6,377,543, entitled “Path restoration of networks;” and U.S. Patent No. 6,654,379, entitled “Integrated ring-mesh network.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; George C. Summerfield, Stadheim & Grear, Chicago, of counsel.
Comments