TQP Development LLC v. Pioneer Electronics Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00508-MHS-CMC
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell, III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Limited, and RMail Limited v. Constant Contact Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00510-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. Epsilon Data Management LLC
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00511-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. ExactTarget Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00512-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. Experian PLC and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00513-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. Responsys Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00514-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. StrongMail Systems Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00515-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. Vocus Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00516-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd., and RMail Ltd. v. Infogroup Inc. and Yesmail Interactive
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00517-JRG
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel.
Blue Calypso Inc. v. LivingSocial Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00518
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,664,516 and U.S. Patent No. 8,155,679, both entitled “Method and System for Peer-to-Peer Advertising Between Mobile Communication Devices.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Melissa Richards Smith, Gillam & Smith, Marshall; W. Bryan Farney, Steven R. Daniels and Bryan D. Atkinson, Farney Daniels, Georgetown.
Blue Spike LLP v. Technicolor USA Inc. and Technicolor SA
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00572-LED
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.
Optigenex Inc. v. Jeunesse Global Holdings LLC, Jeunesse LLC, Vincent Giampapa, Nathan Newman and Vitaquest International Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00573-LED
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,238,675 and U.S. Patent No. 6,361,805, both entitled “Method of Preparation and Composition of a Water Soluble Extract of the Plant Species Uncaria for Enhancing Immune, Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Tumor Processes of Warm Blooded Animals”; U.S. Patent No. 6,964,784, U.S. Patent No. 7,595,064 and U.S. Patent No. 7,947,312, all entitled “Method of Preparation and Composition of a Water Soluble Extract of the Bioactive Component of the Plant Species Uncaria for Enhancing Immune, Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Tumor and DNA Repair Processes of Warm Blooded Animals”; and U.S. Patent No. 7,955,626 “Method for Enhancing the DNA Repair Process, Treating Disorders Associated with the DNA Repair Process, Enhancing Anti-Tumor Response and Treating Disorders Associated with Anti-Tumor Response in Mammals by Administering Purified Quinic Acid and/or Carboxy Alkyl Ester.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew T. Gorham, Robert M. Parker, Robert Christopher Bunt and Charles Ainsworth, Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, Tyler; David W. Denenberg, Davidoff Hutcher & Citron, Garden City, N.Y.
-- Christine Lesicko
Comments