Search Tex Parte Blog

  • Google



  •   An Affiliate of the Network

    From the Newswire

    Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
    View a Sample

« Highland Financial Partners LP and related companies seek $95 million from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in state court suit | Main | Morning docket »

January 30, 2012


Greg Marcum

Mr. Chamberlin's statement that the mandatory rule would be fundamentally unfair to the defendants is funny. Expedited trials are exactly what the defendants wanted when the loser-pays law was being debated. Now that they are getting what they want it somehow unfair. Funny, but also ironic. If defendants typically have the advantage in terms of money and defense attorneys why wouldn't they want the lawsuit process to proceed faster? How much of an advantage can a plaintiff possibly get by simply pleading damages under $100,000?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.