-- Miriam Rozen
| An Affiliate of the Law.com Network |
||||
| ||||
| ||||
Posted at 04:29 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
University of Houston Law Center professor David Dow, litigation director for the Texas Defender Service, writes about his life as a death penalty lawyer in "The Autobiography of an Execution," published Feb. 3 by Twelve Publishing. “It’s not really a strong argument about the death penalty, one way or another,” Dow says of the book. “It’s more about my life as a death penalty lawyer.” Dow says he has represented more than 100 death-row inmates -- most of them in Texas -- over the past two decades. But in a Jan. 25 blog posting, Dow noted that one of the reasons he wrote the book was to convey that being a death penalty lawyer does not mean he forgives or excuses murder. Dow wrote in the posting: “I started being a death penalty lawyer because I agreed to work on behalf of a single inmate whose lawyer quit when the inmate was two weeks away from execution. I kept being a death penalty lawyer because I can't stop. It's like being at an excruciating lecture. If I act quickly, I can get up and pretend to go to the bathroom and never return, but if I wait too long, and I'm left there with just a handful of other Hamlets, I can't bring myself to leave until it's done.” Dow is scheduled to appear for book signings at 7 p.m. Feb. 9 at Legacy Books in Plano and at 7 p.m. Feb. 10 at Borders in Dallas.
-- Mary Alice Robbins
Posted at 03:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
If someone wants to learn how to be a female Texas prosecutor, or at least look like one on TV, who better to learn from than Terri Moore (pictured), Dallas County’s first assistant district attorney? Moore says she met with actress Jenny Wade — who is in Dallas filming “Code 58,” a police drama currently in production for Fox television — a few weeks ago so the actress could pick Moore’s brain. Moore says she talked to Wade about whether Wade's role as an assistant DA on the show was realistic. She gathered from Wade that there was some humor in Wade's character. “And I’m like, ‘Well, I’ve got a good sense of humor, but what I do is real serious,’ ” Moore says. Moore also set Wade straight on how ADAs interact with police officers. “I said, ‘You can instruct the case and have a lot of influence on it, but you’re not in charge of the police officers,’ ” Moore says. So if Wade becomes the first actress to play a realistic prosecutor on network television, you'll know who to thank.
-- John Council
Posted at 12:56 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 10:14 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 02:15 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
To have and to hold: Meet four married lawyer-couples who have found wedded bliss with a beloved who happens to be a member of the bar. Senior reporter John Council traces the arc of cupid's arrows. Pictured are Keith Dean and Elizabeth Crowder, on their wedding day and now.
Body count: Lawyer ranks are thinning. Senior reporter Brenda Sapino Jeffreys finds out which firms have lost the most attorneys and how those who have escaped the recession relatively unscathed did it.
Say nothing: On an issue that just won't go away, the State Bar board recommends that the high court not make lawyers tell clients whether they carry professional liability insurance. Senior reporter Mary Alice Robbins finds out why.
Lemurs and iguanas and hedgehogs, oh my! Senior reporter Mary Alice Robbins talks with SPCA of Texas GC Claire Collins Schwarz (pictured), the lawyer for the previous owners of approximately 27,000 seized critters, a lawyer for PETA, and others for the straight scat on the largest animal rescue in the United States.
The next big thing: Toyota litigation is revving up in Texas. Reporter Miriam Rozen talks to some lawyers who are getting behind the wheel.
Oh, baby: Austin solo Adam Reposa of in-court masturbatory-gesture fame will serve most of his sentence out of jail. Senior reporter Mary Alice Robbins has the low-down from the hearing.
Posted at 02:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 03:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Here's how a Texas Supreme Court candidate forum usually goes (and I've been to a few of them in my time). As an introduction, each candidate stands up and tells the audience that he or she has more experience than the other candidates. People ask questions of the candidates, who answer and often agree with each other. Then the audience members scratch their heads as to who should get their vote. That's kind of how it went this afternoon at a Republican candidate forum put on by the Dallas Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society for the Place 3 spot on the Texas Supreme Court. A half-dozen Republicans are running to replace retiring Justice Harriet O'Neill. Five of the six Republican candidates showed up; Dripping Springs solo Rick Green had a family emergency and couldn't make it to the Dallas Bar Association's Belo Mansion. I can gladly report that all of the candidates who appeared — including 4th Court of Appeals Justice Rebecca Simmons, 14th Court of Appeals Justice Jeff Brown, 11th Court of Appeals Justice Rick Strange, 360th District Judge Debra Lehrmann and 5th Court of Appeals Justice James Moseley — all can speak in complete sentences and sound, well, judicial. I'm not sure if any of them distinguished themselves particularly, except in one respect: the cool campaign tchotchkes they left at a sign-in table. I particularly dug the Justice Rebecca Simmons mints and the "Get Strange!" pencil/gavel (pictured). Maybe handing out neat stuff is the real path to the Texas Supreme Court. High court races have been decided on a lot less.
-- John Council
Posted at 03:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
A new requirement takes effect Feb. 15 at the Texas Supreme Court. Beginning on that date, attorneys must e-mail copies of petitions, responses, replies, briefs on the merits and other documents to the clerk’s office at the court on the same day that they file the paper copies. In December 2009, the high court issued an order that established the procedures for submitting the electronic copies. Attorneys must e-mail the copies of documents to scebriefs@courts.state.tx.us. However, the Supreme Court has not changed the filing requirement. All filings must be on paper.
-- Mary Alice Robbins
Posted at 02:45 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 02:44 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 01:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 12:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Texas lawyers are revving their engines for the litigation battle expected to ensue from the widely reported, sudden-acceleration issues related to recalled Toyota automobiles. “This is a watershed event for the automobile industry,” says Kenneth Mingledorff (pictured), a partner in The Mingledorff Law Firm in Houston with his wife Judy P. Mingledorff, who he says will be “equal counsel” on the case. Ken Mingledorff says he intends to hire more support staff as soon as possible to handle the flood of calls he has begun receiving since filing a Toyota-related wrongful death petition. On Feb.1, he filed Michael Cleighton Harris, et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., et al.in the 189th District Court of Harris County. The suit is on behalf of a woman who died when her leased 2009 Toyota Corolla allegedly accelerated uncontrollably and crashed into a cement embankment. The Harrispetition also names as plaintiffs Michael Cleighton Harris, the crash victim’s surviving husband, and her two children. Named defendants include: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc.; the Elkhart, Ind.-based CTS Corp., which the petition claims designs and manufactures electronic components and sensors in the gas pedal systems of Toyotas; and Fred Haas Toyota World, Ltd., a dealership in Spring that allegedly leased the Corolla to the crash victim. The petition alleges the defendants are responsible for Trina Renee Harris’ wrongful death and for product liability. Mingledorff says the victim's widower, a military man who expects to return to the war zone shortly, called him and asked him to handle the case. Mingledorff believes his previous successful pursuit of wrongful death cases led the widower to him. But since news of the Harris petition has surfaced, Mingledorff says, other lawyers, experts and other possible Toyota-related plaintiffs have been keeping his office phones busy. Although he says he expects to keep the Harrissuit separate from all others, Mingledorff says he has received a call and an e-mail from lawyers at Corpus Christi’s Hilliard Munoz Guerra, who filed a class action complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Corpus Christi on Jan. 29. In that complaint, Sylvia Pena and Albert A. Pena, et al v. Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., the plaintiffs allege the defendants breached an implied warranty. The plaintiffs also note that in the future they will show violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The class, identified in the complaint as numbering “hundreds of thousands,” is identified as Texas residents who presently own Toyota and Lexus vehicles equipped with allegedly faulty "Electronic Throttle Control Systems with Intelligence." Robert Hilliard, a partner in Hilliard Munoz, confirms that his office has reached out to Mingledorff. But Hilliard agrees with Mingledorff that the wrongful-death and personal injury cases related to the alleged Toyota acceleration issues will not be part of the class action case he filed on behalf of plaintiffs related to their property claims. Hilliard says his hope is that a U.S. district judge in Corpus Christi certifies a Texas class of plaintiffs; then he expects that class, represented by his firm, to join what he expects will be multidistrict litigation that will be established in a federal court in Los Angeles, where the most mature, related class-actions claims against Toyota were filed Jan.22. Sona Iliffe-Moon, a spokeswoman for Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc. did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment. But on Feb. 3, the company posted a press release on its Web site stating: “Our message to Toyota owners is this – if you experience any issues with your accelerator pedal, please contact your dealer without delay. If you are not experiencing any issues with your pedal, we are confident that your vehicle is safe to drive. Nothing is more important to Toyota than the safety and reliability of the vehicles our customers drive. Our entire organization of 172,000 North American employees and dealership personnel is working around the clock to fix the accelerator pedals for our customers.” A message left for Toyota Motor Corp. was not immediately returned, but a recording refers press calls to the Web site, which is the same site as that for Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. CTS spokesperson Mitch Walorski did not immediately return a call seeking comment. But on Jan. 29 the company posted on its Web site a press release stating that the company had “deep concern that there is widespread confusion and incorrect information about the role of CTS-manufactured gas pedals in the media coverage of the recent Toyota recall.” The CTS statement quotes Dennis Thornton, a company vice president: “We are disappointed that, despite these facts, CTS accelerator pedals have been frequently associated with the sudden unintended acceleration problems and incidents in various media reports.” A receptionist at Fred Haas Toyota World, Ltd., said that all press calls were being referred to Toyota’s corporate office. Messages left at the telephone numbers she provided were not immediately returned.
-- Miriam Rozen
Posted at 11:23 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
After determining today that he had jurisdiction to hear Austin solo Adam Reposa’s request to modify the manner and means in which Reposa (pictured)serves a 90-day sentence for criminal contempt, Senior District Judge Paul Davis of Austin ordered that Reposa remain confined in the Travis County Jail through Feb. 12 instead of for the entire 90 days. “I want you to be there a full 10 days,” Davis told Reposa, who appeared before the judge in striped jail garb. Davis further ordered that after Feb. 12, Reposa is permitted to participate in the Travis County Sheriff's Weekend Alternative Program, know as SWAP, in which he will perform work in the community or for the county on weekends but will remain out of the jail. Davis also ordered Reposa to wear an electronic monitor and said Reposa would receive jail credit while wearing it. Davis said he was making it a condition that Reposa faithfully attend to all the needs of his girlfriend Susan McCleary and the child they will have. McCleary testified at today’s hearing that their baby is due March 5 and that she needs Reposa’s help at home. “I don’t have any other relatives in Austin,” she told the judge. Davis said his main reason for modifying the way Reposa serves his sentence is because Reposa is becoming a father. Davis originally sentenced Reposa in April 2008 for Reposa's conduct before Travis County Court-at-Law No. 6 Judge Jan Breland. According to Breland's testimony at an April 2008 hearing, Reposa made an obscene gesture simulating masturbation while standing before her with a client in March 2008. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the contempt findingand Reposa's 90-day sentence on Oct. 29, 2009. In January, the CCA denied Reposa's motion for rehearing and issued the mandate in the case on Jan. 28. At today’s hearing, Davis heard from four judges who said Reposa’s conduct had improved since Davis sentenced him to the 90 days. Reposa’s lawyer, Austin solo Todd Dudley, had subpoenaed the four judges to testify. Judge Charlie Baird of the 299th District Court testified that he had noticed a marked improvement in Reposa’s courtroom conduct. “I would not be here, I promise you, if I didn’t think he’d changed,” Baird testified. Also testifying were 167th District Judge Mike Lynch, County Court-at-Law No. 8 Judge Carlos H. Barrera, and County Court-at-Law No. 4 Judge Mike Denton.
-- Mary Alice Robbins
Posted at 05:03 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
It’s hard to fathom why anyone, other than a law enforcement officer, would attempt to bring a gun into a federal courthouse. Victoria Lynn Fields was arrested on Jan. 28, when she allegedly attempted to bring a loaded .45 caliber pistol into Texarkana’s U.S. District Courthouse, according to an arrest affidavit filed against her before a U.S. magistrate judge. According to the affidavit, Fields was in the courthouse for a civil hearing when she placed several large bags on the X-ray table in the courthouse lobby. A courthouse security officer noticed a gun in one of the bags and detained Fields. Fields was involved in a civil hearing that morning before U.S. Magistrate Caroline Craven, according to the affidavit. That day, Craven was scheduled to hold a default judgment hearing in Fields v. Ruff Riders Lifestyles Corp., a suit Fields had filed pro se last year, in which she alleged that the motorcycle club had misappropriated her identity. Craven recused herself from that case later on Jan. 28. In her order, Craven wrote that the “Plaintiff [Fields] has a history with this court of filing unmeritorious lawsuits. She has had numerous contacts with the clerk of the court regarding the status of the current lawsuit and has expressed her dissatisfaction with the undersigned regarding plaintiff’s treatment by the court.” Today U.S. Magistrate Chad Everingham, who has been assigned Field’s criminal case, granted a defense motion to have Fields go through a psychological examination to determine whether she is competent to stand trial and to assist in her own defense. Field’s attorney, Wayne Dickey, an assistant federal public defender, did not immediately return a call for comment. Davilyn Walton, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas, say Fields' case is still under investigation and declines comment.
-- John Council
Posted at 03:52 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 02:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
After testimony at a hearing this morning, Senior District Judge Paul Davis of Austin is mulling over whether he has jurisdiction to change the manner and means of Austin solo Adam Reposa's 90-day sentence for criminal contempt. Reposa turned himself in to the Travis County jail on Feb. 2. Davis assessed the sentence in April 2008 for Reposa's conduct before Travis County Court-at-Law No. 6 Judge Jan Breland. According to Breland's testimony at an April 2008 hearing, Reposa made an obscene gesture simulating masturbation while standing before her with a client in March 2008. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the contempt finding and Reposa's 90-day sentence on Oct. 29, 2009. In January, the CCA denied Reposa's motion for rehearing and issued the mandate in the case on Jan. 28. This morning, Davis heard testimony from four judges. Also at the hearing, Reposa, wearing a jail jumpsuit, and his lawyer, Austin solo Todd Dudley, asked Davis to allow Reposa to serve his sentence through the Travis County Sheriff's Work Alternative Program, which would allow Reposa to continue working. But First Assistant County Attorney Steve Capelle argued that Davis no longer has jurisdiction to change Reposa's sentence. Davis recessed today's hearing so that he could consider the statutes and arguments over lunch. The hearing will resume at 1:30 p.m. today.
-- Mary Alice Robbins
Posted at 12:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Even though it’s a good eight months away from the 2010 general election, Eric Johnson (pictured), a solo from Dallas, found out today that he’s essentially on his way to the Texas House of Representatives. That’s because the longtime incumbent he’s challenging in the March Democratic primary election, Gladys E. "Terri" Hodge, pleaded guilty today in a U.S. District Court in Dallas to a charge of “fraud and false statements on an income tax return.” According to a factual résumé filed in the court along with the guilty plea, Hodge was provided a reduced rent on an apartment and free carpeting by a low-income housing developer — income that she did not report on tax returns. She faces up to three years in prison, according to the plea agreement. Also according to the plea agreement: “Hodge further agrees to resign her office as state representative for Texas House District 100 at the time the sentence is imposed by the court and to forbear from seeking or holding future public office thereafter.” U.S. District Court Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn has not yet set a sentencing hearing. Hodge did not immediately return a call for comment, nor did Johnson. Hodge’s attorney Jeff Kearney of Fort Worth’s Kearney Wynn, did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment. But Johnson, a former associate with the Dallas office of Haynes & Boone, is likely getting ready to serve in Austin, as no Republican filed to run in the heavily Democratic house district.
-- John Council
Posted at 12:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
A prospective law school student who alleges he has a disability filed a suit in U.S. District Court in the Western District of Texas, seeking a court order to force the Law School Admissions Council to provide him with accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act for the Law School Admissions Test. Matthew Scott Jones of Austin alleges he was scheduled to take the LSAT in 2009 in Austin, but he didn’t take the test because the LSAC “has illegally refused and is illegally refusing to accommodate Jones’ learning disability by refusing to provide Jones additional time to take the LSAT.” He alleges he was diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and his disability impairs his reading ability and his ability to concentrate “to the point that his competence level is below that expected in comparison to most people.” In Matthew Scott Jones v. Law School Admissions Council, Jones alleges the LSAC should provide him with double time to take the test and his test results should not be flagged as “not taken under standard conditions.” Jones alleges that he asked the LSAC for accommodations when he was first scheduled to take the exam in September 2009, but the LSAC notified him in July 2009 that it had denied his request for accommodation on the ground he had “not demonstrated that he was ‘substantially limit[ed] in a major life activity.’ ” Jones seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the LSAC from refusing to comply with his request, as well as compensatory damages and attorney’s fees. He alleges the LSAC has violated Title III of the ADA, which prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in professional examinations. Wendy Margolis, a spokeswoman for the Newtown, Pa.-based Law School Admissions Council, did not immediately return a telephone message seeking comment. The suit filed on Jan. 28 is pending before U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks in Austin.
-- Brenda Sapino Jeffreys
Posted at 02:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
If time is money, then the recent ruling in The City of San Antonio, et al. v. NRG Inc., et al. stands for the proposition that time gets short-changed when a whole lot of money is at stake. The Jan. 29 decision in the declaratory judgment action could have implications for the future of the multibillion expansion of the South Texas Nuclear Project in Baytown. One of the plaintiffs in the case, CPS Energy, a municipal utility company owned by the city of San Antonio, wanted a quick ruling in the contract dispute to determine its future interest in the project, says Mike Moore (pictured), a partner in the Dallas office of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal who represents CPS. The dispute is costing the partners in the project $1 million a day in engineering costs, he says. CPS filed the suit in state court in San Antonio on Dec. 6, 2009. On Jan. 5, 408th District Court Judge Larry Noll issued a scheduling order. The case was set for a trial before the court on Jan. 25. “I think we did a year’s worth of work in 20 days, frankly,” Moore says of the hyperspeed litigation, which involved the exchange of hundreds of thousands of documents in discovery, two removals to federal court, two subsequent remands to state court and two petitions for mandamus review before the Texas Supreme Court. “I’ve got to tell you, man, this is not the kind of thing you want to do.” Noll ruled in CPS’ favor, finding that it would not forfeit its 50 percent interest in the project if it stopped putting money into the project. But Noll also ruled that further litigation would be necessary if CPS did decide to stop paying for the project. “It was, as you might guess, a tremendous undertaking, both in manpower and in technology,” says Lamont Jefferson, a partner in the San Antonio office of Haynes and Boone who represents defendant Nuclear Innovation North America, another partner in the project and a subsidiary of NRG Energy Inc. Greg Coleman, a partner in the Austin office of Yetter Warden & Coleman who represents NRG, says the super-quick litigation made him focus on what was most important: "It was very fast paced, and you have to make decisions about what to press for and using the time you have for the case you’re putting on.”
-- John Council
Posted at 01:22 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

